Moment of Inertia Lab
Objective:
Calculate the object's mass and predict the rotational acceleration if a cart was attached to it on a string going down a frictionless slope.
Set up:
First we are given a large metal disk on a central shaft(it has a known overall mass) and a caliper to measure its volume. Second, we have a track and a cart on a light string tied to the shaft of the apparatus.
The Approach:
We approached this problem assuming that the disk has a uniform distribution of density, and that the shaft has negligible friction. From there find the volume of the apparatus by separating it into the sections (two small cylinders that stick out of a large disk) as seen in the figure below. Once we find their volumes, we find what ratio the large disk is compared to the small cylinders since density is evenly distributed by the same ratio.
M = V M,V= values for large disk
m v m,v= values for small cylinders (each)
Since V= 13.18v, then compared to 2v, V is 6.59 times larger in comparison to the sum of the cylinders. Thus, the disk's mass is 6.59 times larger resulting to mass of 3.915 kg from the total 4.615 kg.
Now that we have the mass values, we calculate each of their inertia and add them together for a system inertia of:
(Big) + 2(small)= (.02 kg*m^2)+ 2(3.99*10^-5 kg*m^2)= 2.008*10^-2 kg*m^2
![]() ![]() |
| Figures 1A and B. A picture of the rolling disk apparatus and Lab work for each part including a small diagram of the second set up for this experiment. |
α= mgsinθ*r Where m is the mass of the cart, r is radius of the shaft, θ is the angle of the slope,
(m(r^2)-Itot) and Itot is the total inertia of the apparatus.
Conclusion:
It seems our derived equation is accurate enough to predict the angular acceleration of our cart set up. Any apparent source of error would source from the friction of the disk, friction of the surface and friction of the axle.


it needs to be mgsin(theta) - T = ma and mr^2 +I.
ReplyDeleteYou can't have mr^2 -I in the denominator, because a small I would give a positive acceleration but a larger I would give a negative acceleration. It worked out here because I is so much larger than mr^2.
Lucky!